-
BLACKOUT TECHNOLOGIES TARGETS TELEMATICS-INTEGRATED MOBILE DEVICE BLOCKING TO COMBAT SMARTPHONE DISTRACTION - April 1, 2025
-
OpenADR Alliance announces first OpenADR 3.0 certified products with EVoke Systems, E.ON Energy and Universal Devices - March 25, 2025
-
Growing fulfilment and contract packer appoints new Managing Director - March 25, 2025
-
When is it time to invest in a WMS? Understanding the key trigger points - March 25, 2025
-
eCapital helps Vantage Recruitment on its journey to financial success - March 24, 2025
-
Hugo Beck Celebrates 70 Years of Packaging Innovation with Open House Events - March 20, 2025
-
PROLOG FULFILMENT SUPPORTS LUNA DAILY’S COMMITMENT TO BETTER BODY CARE FOR ALL WOMEN - March 19, 2025
-
Motion Ventures launches largest-ever maritime tech fund at $100M to meet the industry’s new pace of adoption - March 18, 2025
-
ITD GLOBAL APPOINTS GROUP CHIEF REVENUE OFFICER - March 17, 2025
-
SURECAM TEAMS UP WITH ENTERPRISE FLEX-E-RENT FOR VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINTENANCE CONFERENCE - March 14, 2025
Freight Forwarders Warned Not To Expect Compensation For Felixstowe Disruption.
Freight forwarders that suffered operational damage and incurred significant additional costs as a result of the disruption to operations at the UK port of Felixstowe following the introduction of a new operating system in June have been warned that they are unlikely to receive any compensation from the port’s owners.
Robert Keen, Director General of the British International Freight Association (BIFA) said:
“Having had a meeting with the port’s senior management, it is clear that the only companies that might receive any compensation are shipping lines.
“The port authority has made it clear to us that it does not consider BIFA members to be direct customers of the port, and would not be willing to have a discussion about possible compensation for the damage caused and the increased costs that have been incurred by those members.
“It is astonishing that a port authority, which owns the UK’s busiest container port and has been happy to market it as the ‘Port of Britain’, implemented a new and vitally important system with apparently no fall-back position if it went wrong.
“And it is very disappointing that it is not even prepared to discuss any kind of compensation for such a failure in customer service.”